by James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP
Over the years there’s been a tsunami of denials from payers, Recovery Audit
Contractors (RAC), and Medicare quality improvement organizations. This is due
to the auditors’ removal of ICD-10-CM codes based on provider documentation;
auditors can perceive that a patient did not have clinical indicators
supporting the presence of the condition.
The recent release of the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s
International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock added jet
fuel to these denials. This guideline supported a redefinition of sepsis (known
as Sepsis-3) as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated
host response to infection.
As such, auditors are now saying that if a code for R65.20
(severe sepsis) or R65.21 (septic shock) is not submitted, other codes for
sepsis (such as those in categories A40-A41) are invalid since the physician
did not document any acute organ dysfunction as linked to the patient’s sepsis.
While coding is based only on provider documentation, hospitals
and payers are authorized to have their own criteria to ascertain the clinical
validity of any submitted code. As such, if a payer has criteria that differ
from those of the provider or the facility, the payer can deny ICD-10-CM/PCS
codes it deems not to fit these criteria.
It seems that not much can stop a payer from denying a code just
because they want to. Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2014, pp. 16–17
gives further power for payers to ignore official ICD-10-CM conventions,
guidelines, and advice by stating, essentially that the facility should work
the payer to inform the payer about the rules and try to work it out.
I see no solution to this dilemma other than to address clinical
validity as follows:
- Traditional Medicare – Through legislation
- State Medicaid – Through legislation or the state’s insurance commissioner
- Private insurance companies – Through contracting
- All three – Rigorous negotiation and implementation of clinical definitions with medical, clinical documentation integrity, coding, and compliance (as allowed by Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2016, pp. 147–149) as to self-audit prior to bill submission and rigorously defend their coding when challenged by RACs.
As such, we must have our own definitions supported by credible
references as well as working directly with the payer’s medical directors.
Facilities must negotiate these definitions in their contracts with payers to
stem the onerous burden of defending our clinically valid coding.
Allow me to review some of my favorite oft denied diagnoses and
their references.
Sepsis: I
am personally a big fan of Sepsis-3, which means that there should be explicit
documentation of some organ dysfunction (notice that it does not have to be
organ failure) due to sepsis to qualify for severe sepsis.
On the other hand, if you want to use Sepsis-2 criteria,
clinical measures should focus on Medicare’s definition of Systemic
Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) due to infection listed in its SEP-1 core
measure. Other references include:
- New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make. By Steven Q. Simpson, MD, FCCP, and published in the Chest Journal
- Characterizing Systemic Immune Dysfunction Syndrome to Fill in the Gaps of SEPSIS-2 and SEPSIS-3 Definitions, also published in the Chest Journal
- Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2016, pp. 147–149 (as discussed above)
Coma: The ICD-10-CM
Index to Diseases classifies the term “unconsciousness” with coma. Patients
must be unarousable to stimuli, such as voice, pain, or inner need. Terms like
“semi-coma” or “obtundation” are still coma clinically, however, the provider
must document coma or unconsciousness to obtain a coma code. Glasgow coma
scales can also support a coma diagnosis.
References include Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology,
10th edition and Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma /Edition 4.
Encephalopathy: A diffuse brain disease or global brain dysfunction manifested
as an altered mental status. ICD-10-CM has many options for documenting its
underlying cause, such as due to medications (toxic encephalopathy), metabolic
issues (acute hypoglycemia, uremia, or hyponatremia), anoxia, and the like.
If a patient’s altered mental status (major neurocognitive
disorder [dementia], delirium, or psychosis) can be explained by a named brain
disease (Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, the late effect of stroke),
then the term “encephalopathy” is integral to these diseases unless it is
explicitly documented that the altered mental status differs from that of the
underlying brain condition.
In other words, the physician must state terms like “toxic
encephalopathy” or “metabolic encephalopathy” and describe what the toxin,
poison, or metabolic issue is. References include Adams and Victor’s Principles
of Neurology, 10th edition, and National Institutes of Health.
Acute respiratory failure: An acute failure to ventilate or oxygenate. Clinical
indicators supporting acute respiratory failure were developed by the Maryland
Hospital Association and are available on its website. Pediatric indicators are
available here. All of these references support the need for high flow oxygen
or outside ventilator support (CPAP, BiPAP, or mechanical ventilation). (To
read an ACDIS White Paper focused on pediatric respiratory failure
specifically, click here.)
Acute kidney injury: Of all the criteria out there, I promote the 2012 KDIGO
criteria. The Acute Kidney Injury Network’s 2007 requirement for rehydration to
assess the presence of acute kidney injury is no longer valid, and the risk,
injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and endstage kidney disease criteria
is so 2005.
Acute tubular necrosis (ATN): An acute kidney injury due to an endogenous (tumor lysis
syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, severe sepsis, hemolysis) or exogenous toxin (ethylene
glycol, aminoglycoside, radiology contrast, certain chemotherapy), is known to
cause ATN, or renal ischemia. This is more common in patients with hemorrhage
shock or with hypotension in the setting of using nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Other precipitating causes, such as renal obstruction, profound
hypovolemia, and other renal diseases (acute interstitial nephritis) are
excluded. Creatinine elevation typically lasts over three days. While urine
studies (urine microscopy, fractional excretion of sodium test) are strongly
recommended, they are not required to make a presumptive diagnosis, especially
if documented at the time of discharge in reasonable circumstances. References
include Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 2-Volume Set and National Kidney
Foundation Primer on Kidney Diseases (Sixth Edition).
Malnutrition: I remain a big fan of the American Society for Parenteral
and Enteral Nutrition’s adult or pediatric malnutrition criteria. However, as I
mentioned in my discussion of the Office of Inspector General’s scrutiny on
Vidant in March, there’s no definitive definition of malnutrition that’s
universally agreed on. But the whole facility needs to be on the same page
about which definition to use.
Functional quadriplegia: The only definition for this is the 2017 ICD-10-CM Official
Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. Read it carefully; it does require that
the term “functional quadriplegia” must be documented in the chart.
Summary
There are many more that we can discuss. A great medical librarian or physician advisor can help CDI professional identify articles to use and some payers will even help too. I believe that the best time to decide this is during contract negotiation. I suggest that you start down that path today.
There are many more that we can discuss. A great medical librarian or physician advisor can help CDI professional identify articles to use and some payers will even help too. I believe that the best time to decide this is during contract negotiation. I suggest that you start down that path today.
Editor’s note: This article originally appeared in JustCoding. Dr. Kennedy is a general internist and
certified coder, specializing in clinical effectiveness, medical informatics,
and clinical documentation and coding improvement strategies. Contact him
at jkennedy@cdimd.com. Opinions expressed are that of the author
and do not necessarily represent HCPro, ACDIS, or any of its subsidiaries.
Copyright Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS). Article reprinted with permission.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.